CA Introduces Hydrocodone Bill; VT Passes Drug Abuse Bills

Congress.jpgWhen was the last time you had two pieces of good news in one day? Well, count yourself lucky because this is one of those days, and in the recovery field, that’s cause for celebration. A few weeks ago, Dr. Nick Techentin, PhD,  a therapist who works for Joan at the Malibu Beach Recovery Center's Brentwood House, sent her a link to an L.A. Times article to let her know that her “hard work is starting to catch on.” He was referring to the fact that lawmakers in Washington DC have introduced a bill that should make it harder for people to abuse hydrocodone (for example, Vicodin). The law would place it “in same category as OxyContin, another opiate-based painkiller so potent and addictive that it's sometimes referred to as synthetic heroin,” the article said. This is in accordance with the FDA recommendations from January.

Nick was also referring to Joan’s regular efforts to help those in recovery by bringing awareness toThumbnail image for Thumbnail image for steinberg.jpg the prescription drug epidemic.  You may recall how politically active she has been, or then again you may not be aware. In 2010, Joan brought two MBRC alumni to Sacramento to lobby in favor of a bill sponsored by Senator Mark DeSaulnier to fund CURES, California's online real time prescription drug data base.  After the bill failed by a single vote, she invited him visit MBRC to speak with addiction industry professionals about resurrecting the CURES database project.  This year after the Los Angeles Times took Attorney General Kamala Harris to task for letting CURES all but die, he reintroduced the bill (with some changes), this time co-sponsored by some political heavyweights like State Senate Speaker Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, State Senators Fran Pavley and Ted Lieu, and Assembly Budget Committee Chairman Bob Blumenfield.  

So the news about hydrocodone was very welcome. The law, if it passes, will be called the Safe Prescribing Act of 2013. There’s no reason to believe it won’t pass, since four lawmakers introduced it, and “more than 40 additional members of Congress from both parties signed on as co-sponsors.”

The second piece of good news concerns the bills passed in VT last month. In an article published in a CT paper, one of the lawmakers involved said the bills were a response to the opiate addiction and methamphetamine abuse in the state. First, the legislation gave good Samaritans, or people who call about overdoses, immunity from prosecution. (Police will not have access to the database without a warrant.) Importantly, it required doctors who prescribe narcotics to register with the state’s CURES-like database and to use it. Pharmacists are required to ask for ID of those picking up prescriptions for certain drugs, and hospitals have to abide by standards set for referring people to drug treatment programs when needed.

assemblyman richard bloom.jpgJoan added:  Just as we were about to publish the above report by Pat, yet another piece of good news arrived.  In a surprise showing of bipartisan support, the California State Assembly Health Committee voted in favor of Assemblyman Richard Bloom's AB 831, a bill that would require a temporary state task force of experts to develop a comprehensive plan to address the state's overdose crisis, as well as to establish a modest funding source for groups working to reduce overdose deaths. Assemblyman Bloom represents Malibu, which is home to two dozen alcohol and drug treatment centers, as well as West Los Angeles and Beverly Hills, home to at least another six treatment centers. The bill now moves to the Assembly Appropriations Committee.

 

Photos (above) Senate Speaker Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg.  (Right) Assembyman Richard Bloom.

CURES Update: California's Online Prescription Drug Data Base Offline, No Funding in Sight

Until recently a doctor could instantly check CURES, California’s real time online data base, to see if thedoctor in front of computer with patient.jpg new patient sitting in front of him/her, seeking a prescription for pain medication, was “doctor shopping” --- going from doctor to doctor to get multiple prescriptions for  the same medications.  Such a pattern red flags addiction.  Pharmacists could check the same data base to discover if the patient was “pharmacy hopping” – filling the same prescriptions at another pharmacy, another red flag for addiction.

Based on my discussions with physicians and pharmacists, the data base which is run by the California Department of Justice, has helped them point out the obvious to addicts and convince some of them to seek treatment. 

Now no more.  CURES still exists; pharmacists still report the narcotics prescriptions they fill every six days and the CURES data base was recently used by law enforcement officials investigating Whitney Houston’s death.  But funding for CURES ended in 2011 and there is now no way for doctors and pharmacists to access the data base real time. 

As we reported in earlier stories about CURES, Bob Pack is the software engineer who in 2009 took responsibility for modernizing the state’s 70 year old antiquated Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP).  He convinced State Senator Mark DeSaulnier to author SB 1071 to fund CURES with a miniscule tax on some the nation's very large and profitable pharmaceutical companies.

It was envisioned that every time a prescription was filled in California for a Schedule II or Schedule III narcotic, the manufacturer would forward to the State coffers approximately 25 cents to keep CURES up and running.  The Controlled Substances Act (CSA) of 1970, which regulates manufacture, importation, possession, use and distribution of certain substances, has five drug schedules.  Here are the drugs included in Schedule II, and here are the drugs included in Schedule III.

On  May 5, 2010 I flew to Sacramento with alumni Krissie BergoThumbnail image for Thumbnail image for krissie april 2011-2.jpg and Laurie Kelsoe.Thumbnail image for laurie Kelsoe.JPG  Krissie and I both spoke at the State Senate Press Conference in support of SB 1071, and then Krissie, Laurie and I spoke at the State Senate Health Committee Hearing in support of SB  1071.  The bill failed because a single Committee member, a Democrat who had pledged to vote yes, suddenly voted no.   She was then running for a statewide office.  Perhaps not by chance just before she voted no she was observed on Senate’s closed circuit TV system having an impromptu tete a tete with a pharmaceutical industry lobbyist.

I cringe every time I read on the website of the National Coalition Against Prescription Drug Abuse reports about yet another state which got its PDMP up and running while California’s pioneering PDMP withers. 

The most recent state is Kentucky – ranked 47th in median household income, 47th in high school graduation rate and 48th in percentage of the population below the poverty line.  Kentucky not only now has a functioning PDMP  but requires all doctors who prescribe federally controlled drugs to refer to the PDMP before writing prescriptions.  

How to remedy the situation?   An informal meeting was scheduled today between the Attorney General and Legislative Staff (from Senator De Saulnier’s Office) to discuss with lack of funding for CURES.  We don’t know the outcome yet. 

Pack, who estimates prescription drug abuse is costing California about $7 billion annually, is collecting signatures to put on the June ballot a measure to raise about $7 million per year to support the CURES program.  The ballot measure includes an educational component for doctors , pharmacists and consumers.

 

There Ought to Be a Law.

We propose that in addition to collecting funding from the nation's pharmaceutical companies, the Department of Justice impose a “CURES fine” on any California doctor convicted of over prescribing or wrongly prescribing. 

Dr. Daniel J. Healy of Duarte would have been an ideal donor.   In April 2010 Healy was sentenced to four years for “prescribing powerful and highly addictive pain killers to people who had no medical need for the drugs.”  Healy ordered more than 1 million tablets of hydrocodone (vicodin) in 2008 -- more than any other doctor and 10 times more than the average American pharmacy.   According to the Los Angeles Times Healy was making so much [illicit] money he kept an automatic money-counting machine in his office.

Dr. Nazar Al Bussam, “California’s top prescriber of narcotic painkillers”  also would have been an ideal donor.  In October 2011 he was sentenced to 7 years in prison.  According to the Los Angeles Times, over a two year period Al Bussam deposited $1.8 million in cash into multiple bank accounts. 

Dr. Lisa Tseng, of Roland Heights is still a potential donor.  She was arrested March 1, 2012 and charged with second degree murder after three of her patients died from prescription drug overdoses.  Some reports say that she and her physician husband paid $5 million in cash for their office building.

 

 

 

 

Does Blue Cross Fuel Addiction by Sending Payment to Addicts Instead of Treatment Providers?

You are an alcoholic or drug addict in the earliest stages of recovery.  You just finished rehab.  On admission you assigned your insurance benefits to the treatment center.cashing check triumphantly.jpg

Suddenly you get a very big check in the mail from your Blue Cross Health Plan, made out to you.  Obviously the money is intended is for the treatment center.   Do you forward it to the treatment center?  Or do you cash the check and spend the money? 

According to alcohol and drug treatment centers up and down the State of California more often than not, the check leads right back to an expensive drug addiction, or triggers a “secondary” addiction like gambling, shopping or overspending.

Is it possible that Anthem Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Hawaii and Blue Cross of Washington State – to name a few --  are unaware that the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) recently updated their definition of addiction to “chronic brain disease?”

Sending the check intended to pay for treatment to the addict or schizophrenic is not like sending a check to someone who broke a leg.

As a supervisor at Blue Shield put it, whenever a claim comes in with a mental health code the system should automatically direct payment to the provider.

Last year we learned the hard way about payment policy of some of the Blue Crosses.  Our client was Colin (not his real name), 32.  In addition to being addicted to prescription pills, he and his Significant Other were very entitled "big spenders" – designer clothes, first class travel, fine dining.  While in treatment, instead of washing his clothes, Colin sent everything out to be cleaned.

Colin's insurance policy only covered part of the treatment costs, and of course he was broke, so his elderly grandparents borrowed money against their social security and pension payments, and his parents cashed out part of their nest egg. 

When we discovered --  to our horror -- that the local Blue Cross, in accordance with their policies, had issued payment to Colin, we were terrified.   We learned through the family Colin and his Significant Other were on vacation in Mexico.  When the couple got home they quickly deposited the check and told the parents no check had arrived.  When Blue Cross confirmed the check had been cashed, Colin told his parents it was a different check.  The parents were ordered to stop communicating with us.  The Significant Other threatened a law suit and hired a lawyer. Obviously Colin was entitled to a financial reward for having completed 30 days of treatment. Fortunately for us, the lawyer insisted that the proceeds of the check be deposited into his client trust account, and then wired us the money.  

Other rehabs have not been so lucky.  One lost $130,000 when clients made off with payments. 

The patient of another treatment center returned home and to his surprise found several large checks waiting for him. By that time he had lost his job and was collecting unemployment.  He hd bills to pay.  So he made a unilateral decision as to what he thought his treatment was actually worth, and kept the rest for himself.    

There ought to be a law.

Doctors Who Fuel Addiction and Relapse

2011 may well be remembered as the year the nation finally ­­realized that it is not just celebrities Heath Ledger.jpgwho are dying from legally prescribed drugs, but tens of millions of ordinary folk – from children to adults to aging baby boomers, in every city and town.  Many of us already suspected what a recent analysis by the Los Angeles Times confirmed:  drug deaths now outnumber those killed in traffic accidents, and prescription drugs are largely to blame.

Law enforcement has begun to take note:  most daily on the organization’s facebook page, Members of the National Coalition Against Prescription Drug Abuse (“NCPDA”) post news about crack downs on local “pill mills” – doctors who make a living writing prescriptions for anyone who pays.  

Unscrupulous doctors operating out of store fronts, with cash counting machines, or via internet, create just part of the grisly statistics.  National and state legislators now need to regulate the practice of pain management – not just for those who specialize in this new field, but for the doctors who staff the Emergency Rooms and Urgent Cares, and also dentists.  Too many of these medical professionals write prescriptions for narcotics and benzodiazepines without a thought to the long-term consequences, or the history of the patient.

Earlier this year we interviewed Dr. Marc Mandel, MD, a Beverly Hills doctor who often serves as a medical expert in Workers' Comp cases involving pain.  Most often the doctors whose treatment he reviews are anesthesiologists. To become pain management specialists they study the pain management curriculum – there is no residency program -- and pass a board test which certifies them in the sub specialty.  

Treatment of pain, says Dr. Mandel, is often related to blocking different nerves, something anesthesiologists are quite adept at doing. 

Dr. Mandel goes on to say:  “The classical textbook on pain management was authored by Doctor Aronoff.  In the introductory chapter of the classic book, he states, 'too many visits to this office may be deleterious to your health'.  And what Doctor Aronoff was stating is that the goal of pain management is to help the patients cope with their pain.  It’s not to simply ply them with medications.  Because if you have an addictive personality, and probably 15 to 20 percent of us do, you’re gonna get hooked on the medications.  And consequently, you’re gonna need ever increasing amounts of drugs to allay the symptoms of pain.

“Now if someone has terminal cancer, I think it’s important to give them medications to make their life as comfortable as possible since the end is near.  But if you’re dealing with a young, adult otherwise healthy person, I think it’s not the best practice to ply them with an enormous number of addicting narcotics.”ER DOC.JPG

Just last week a client, we will call her Lynda, had a very impacted wisdom tooth which needed to be pulled while she was still in treatment. Lynda was born addicted to cocaine. She has battled most of her young life with substance abuse, specifically opiates.  The dentist was told not to use narcotics and he did not, but a subsequent infection sent her to another dentist.  His staff was warned that Lynda was in early recovery when the appointment was made, and the counselor who accompanied her wrote a note to the dentist.  Nonetheless, he handed her a prescription for percoset, a Schedule II (controlled) narcotic whose main active ingredients include oxycodone -- basically synthetic morphine and highly addictive.   As an addict, Lynda was really tempted -- after all it was a dentist who wrote the prescription.  It took virtually the whole clinical team to talk her down.   Next morning I called the dentist, more to enlighten him then to complain.  I said that a Class II narcotic could “awake the sleeping dragon” in any addict and cause a relapse.  My comments were met with pure attitude.

A week before that Lynda’s roommate Anais managed a trip to the Emergency Room for “excruciating” back pain.   A chiropractor confirmed that years of living on the street had taken its toll and that now, off pain-numbing opiates, Anais was finally feeling the consequences.   He also said she could manage the pain with over the counter ibuprofen.  The paramedics told the ER staff Anais wa a patient at an alcohol and drug treatment center.  The counselor accompanying her told the doctor she was in early recovery.   Yet when Anais shooed the counselor out of the room, the ER doctor gave her a shot of morphine. 

Krissie Bergo, who we wrote about last June, came to us through Workers' Comp.  She spent 73 days at Malibu Beach Recovery Center and then 6  weeks at Oceanside Transitional Living.  It cost her insurance more than $100,000 to get her off $50,000/month of toxic opiates and benzodiazepines, all prescribed by a single Workers' Comp pain management doctor.  Incredibly the next Workers' Comp doctor she was assigned ordered her back on hydrocodone, another addictive Schedule II (controlled) narcotic.  She knew enough about addiction to refuse.  Then she went to the dentist and though she told him she was in recovery, he used a benzodiazepine to numb her gums.  I believe it was inadvertent, but warned that Krissie was an addict,  he need to be more vigilant.  She spiraled out of control and had to check back in to MBRC to avoid relapse.

Any addict looking for a quick fix, or a prescription on which to relapse, has to go no further than our local Urgent care.  The doctor told me he would rather give the patient demanding narcotics what he/she wants and out the front door than risk a bad internet write-up.  

ER doctors who want to do the right thing may be putting their jobs at risk said Douglas, a former drug and alcohol counselor who called in to the September 27, 2011 broadcast of “Talk of the Nation.” Douglas told Neil Conan, host of the award-winning  PBS news show, that two of his current clients are emergency room physicians,  He said doing the right thing is hard when you are graded on performance, which includes patient feedback.

Douglas (caller):  “So they'll get clients, patients coming in who are drug-addicted, on Oxycontin, other drugs like you've mentioned, and will press for the drugs...If they spend the time discouraging that patient, it ends up scoring negatively against them.”

In the United Kingdom doctors are being sued for creating prescription drug addicts amid claims they have failed to follow safety guidelines published more than 20 years ago.

Are frustrated Americans going to "occupy" the lobby of the AMA this year?  Stay tuned.